This article is a misleading. The above mentioned event was supposedly reported in early May 2001. Newspapers have revitalized the story, copying it without stating when it actually happened. http://www.biopoliticaltimes.org/article.php?id=6837
It is important to note, however, that this thing did happen, but not recently. Now it would make sense to look out for these children, and see if they struggle. They should be 12 years old.
This is still very troubling, whether the children were born in 2001 or "last night". They are not doing well, I am getting- there's something jarringly "off" with about 10 or 12 of them- psychologically primarily there seems to be a preponderance towards latent personality disorders just about to emerge. Wait until they are 16 or 17 for the really nightmarish aspects to start revealing themselves, personality-wise. Am getting there may be issues leaning towards physical frailty as well in some of them. Nutrients for some reason do not synthesize as well causing a protein in the brain to not develop as fully thus potentially affecting the amygdalae sections of the brain, which makes sense since those parts control emotional reactions, emotional learning, and memory. You cannot play God and expect God to be present. You cannot synthetically manufacture and tinker with the divine. It is given and inherent, it isn't built in a lab- ever. Thus it is not surprising that psychological problems would start to present themselves. If something is off about something that is not holy, it will show itself sooner or later. I feel very sorry for these kids. Not all of them have this, but a significant portion do. The physical frailty things will probably start to show themselves in their 30s or 40s.
This article is a misleading. The above mentioned event was supposedly reported in early May 2001. Newspapers have revitalized the story, copying it without stating when it actually happened.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.biopoliticaltimes.org/article.php?id=6837
It is important to note, however, that this thing did happen, but not recently. Now it would make sense to look out for these children, and see if they struggle. They should be 12 years old.
This is still very troubling, whether the children were born in 2001 or "last night". They are not doing well, I am getting- there's something jarringly "off" with about 10 or 12 of them- psychologically primarily there seems to be a preponderance towards latent personality disorders just about to emerge. Wait until they are 16 or 17 for the really nightmarish aspects to start revealing themselves, personality-wise. Am getting there may be issues leaning towards physical frailty as well in some of them. Nutrients for some reason do not synthesize as well causing a protein in the brain to not develop as fully thus potentially affecting the amygdalae sections of the brain, which makes sense since those parts control emotional reactions, emotional learning, and memory. You cannot play God and expect God to be present. You cannot synthetically manufacture and tinker with the divine. It is given and inherent, it isn't built in a lab- ever. Thus it is not surprising that psychological problems would start to present themselves. If something is off about something that is not holy, it will show itself sooner or later. I feel very sorry for these kids. Not all of them have this, but a significant portion do. The physical frailty things will probably start to show themselves in their 30s or 40s.
ReplyDelete