Liberal media lies… starting with the biggest lie that media is "liberal" (Re: 50th Anniversary of Kennedy Assassination)

Congratulations, NPR/WBAI/WNYC, you have successfully proven that you are no different than Fox news in terms of getting the truth out- you've successfully just lied in interviewing an Illuminati/Knights of Malta shill for your morning news on the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President Kennedy and offered no counterpoint to this guy literally, breathtakingly stupidly saying "most people accept the official story that Oswald… wanted to brag about what a "good shot" he was in shooting the President".

Apparently "conspiracy theorists" have all kinds of "wacky" theories, like the fact that the ballistics of that day are pretty much impossible if you say that Oswald did it alone. You are the real "patsy" if you believe "Oswald did it and he acted alone" and if you contribute any funds at all to NPR in the hopes that you will get any useful, grown up information about the assassination of the President or anything else. Just in case you didn't know, the "liberal" media is exactly the opposite of what they say they are- they are about as corporate and non-liberal as you can get.

PBS has Charlie Rose, a Bilderberg group member, NPR and PBS are both heavily funded by orgs like the Rockefeller Foundation and other globalist thugs, and the executive editor of the New York Times Jill Abramson is a traitor to the human race by also being a huge, gigantic lapdog for the Bilderberg Group as well. The mainstream press in fact are some of the biggest betrayers of humanity there are.

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.  It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller

Or how about this one:

 "For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." - David Rockefeller