I don't mean to speak ill of lightworkers and people with good intentions... but I am deeply concerned by some statements made in the recent Project Camelot interview by A'Shayana Deane.
Within the first five minutes, she states that "channeling is dangerous" and then proceeds to take 10 minutes of exposition just to make the first statement. If you are really connected to Source and really listening to truth and heart-based "mechanics", you are not in mind like that. It is not an astrophysics theorem. If you are speaking truth, you simply speak it, the terminology of "ascension mechanics" does not require so much labyrinthian set up to explain. You just say it.
I am deeply concerned that this woman is in fact being contacted, but not by the kinds of "love and light, service to others" ETs she claims from a group she refers to as the "Galactic Alliance". It is normally not my place to be so bold in speaking publicly about another person "in the field" so to speak, but when someone says "channeling is dangerous" my feelers/antennae go up immediately. My feelers are saying "this woman is fear based and being manipulated" at the core- and not only that, she goes on to say that the Wingmakers material is subversive and dangerous for the following reasons (response on Kerry Cassidy's blog from James himself):
The identity of the WingMakers is not how I have portrayed them, but rather they are a fallen race of ETs with a dark agenda.
2) That the WingMakers art and music activate a DNA response from those who view or listen to the material that brings about a negative merkaba.
3) That the WingMakers caused the recent earthquakes in Chile, killing innocent lives.
I would use caution when being given information by anyone in esoterica who says "you are wrong and I am right, and I have been the one to 'set the record straight' and tell you what it really is." That is cult-mind at work, ladies and gentlemen.
No one has all the information, nor is esoteric information verifiable on any kind of scientific methodology as pertains to "ascension mechanics".
She gets out charts, presents words and terms that frankly don't resonate and sound completely made-up, and in turn to James's response on the blog, she reacts defensively and acts like he was the one in the wrong for defending his writings (which, admittedly for the sake of complete personal disclosure, are in complete service-to-others mode, if you ask me.)
James' work rings true for me, this woman's does not. In full truth, I have not given the interview the full attention it deserves, and I need to review it further, but if you cannot explain or express in plain language ascension mechanics, you have no business delving so deeply. It does not require made up terms, or any kind of claim of "expert" or "specialty" status, and certainly would not involve warning people off of the work of a man who has served tirelessly and with great humility for the good of humanity by empowering them in awakening with such love and compassion.
All that is required in explaining or expressing ascension mechanics is the pure intention of LOVE and heart. The rest will follow.
I do not trust this woman as far as I could throw her, but I leave it up to you to decide for yourself. My opinion may change as I absorb more of her information, but my first impression of A'shayana Deane is not a good one, ladies and gentlemen. Just some food for thought.
Love and Light,
(link to Kerry's blog with letters from both James and A'shayana:
ADDENUM: For those of you who have not had a chance to read the comments on this post, A'shayana Deane is 100% definitively Anna Hayes the contactee. The sudden need for an identity change is very suspicious to me- people are emailing me as well saying that suddenly most if not all of the Anna Hayes videos on Youtube are no longer posted on the site. Alter egos don't bode well with me, it smacks too much of dissociative identity disorder. It may be one thing for a rock star to do that for "creative license", but when it is a member of the esoteric community, I am always suspicious. I leave it up to you to decide for yourself what the meaning of this is.